Each Mini Solution is a self-contained, production-ready compliance system — a PostgreSQL schema, n8n automation workflow, and HTML portal addressing a single, specific regulatory obligation. Buy one. Deploy it. Own it. No subscription. No hidden costs. No dependencies.
Select your industry to browse the five production-ready compliance systems available for standalone purchase. Each system can be deployed independently or bundled as part of a full platform deployment.
SRA Code of Conduct 2019 · Money Laundering Regulations 2017 · SRA Accounts Rules
A production-ready supervision event tracking system mapping directly to SRA Code of Conduct 2019 §7.1. Records every supervision event, outcome, and follow-up action with a tamper-evident, timestamped audit trail. COLPs can retrieve evidence of supervision coverage for any fee earner in under 30 seconds — the record the SRA expects to see on file visit.
A per-matter compliance checklist system that enforces AML verification, client ID checks, and matter-opening procedures at the point of matter creation. Every checklist completion is stored with timestamp, user identity, and outcome — producing COLP and MLRO evidence without manual log-keeping.
A 23-node n8n workflow that reads the supervision register and matter checklist database, calculates a regulatory readiness score across multiple compliance domains, and generates a formatted PDF report — on a schedule, on demand, or upon sign-off approval. Produces the audit-ready evidence pack an SRA file review expects to find in existence.
A governed precedent library that stores, versions, and retrieves approved legal templates with access control, expiry management, and author accountability. Every precedent is traceable to the supervising partner who approved it — satisfying SRA obligations around supervision of work product and maintaining a firm's standards of service quality.
A structured request and approval workflow that governs the creation of new legal precedents — from initial request, through supervisory review, to library publication. Every decision and override is logged with the responsible partner's identity, creating a chain of accountability that is retrievable at file review without manual recordkeeping.
FCA Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SMCR) · COCON 2.1 · FCA TC Sourcebook · SUP 2.3
A governed database for recording and maintaining the Statement of Responsibilities for every Senior Manager Function holder. The system maintains version-controlled SoR records, tracks amendments with approver identity and date, and generates formatted SoR documents on demand. Satisfies FCA SMCR accountability mapping obligations under SUP 10C and Senior Manager accountability chain requirements.
A structured system for recording the annual Certification Regime assessments required under the FCA's SMCR. Stores assessment records for every Certified Person, tracks fitness and propriety evidence, and generates the evidence pack auditors expect. Automated due-date reminders prevent the systematic failure — missed annual assessments — that most firms face under the Certification Regime.
A governed breach register that captures Conduct Rules breaches at the point of identification, routes them through a structured investigation workflow, and tracks FCA notification obligations and deadlines. The system ensures that no notification deadline is missed through automated reminders, and that every investigation outcome is documented with the evidence required under SMCR.
A structured workflow that assembles an FCA-ready document production pack from the compliance database on demand — filtered by audit period, regulatory domain, or individual. Eliminates the high-pressure evidence scramble during FCA visits by producing structured, timestamped evidence packs in minutes rather than days, from data that is maintained continuously rather than assembled in crisis.
A regulatory training and competency evidence register that maps every training record to the FCA regulatory obligation it satisfies. Tracks expiry dates, generates renewal reminders before FCA-mandated deadlines, and surfaces competency gaps in real time. The evidence of a structured T&C scheme — not just training completion records — that the FCA expects to see demonstrated during supervision.
ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System · Documented Information Requirements · Continual Improvement
A production-controlled document management system that satisfies ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.5 requirements for maintaining and retaining documented information. Every document is version-controlled, review-scheduled, and access-logged. Obsolete versions are archived, not deleted — maintaining the historical record that certification auditors require to verify a controlled document programme has been in continuous operation.
A structured NCR system that captures non-conformances at detection, routes them through root cause analysis and corrective action assignment, and tracks closure. Every NCR is linked to the product, process, or service it affects — enabling the trend analysis and pattern identification that ISO 9001 Clause 10.2 requires as evidence of a functioning corrective action programme, not merely a reactive one.
A management review evidence system that captures the inputs, discussions, decisions, and follow-up actions of ISO 9001 management reviews — and produces the evidence pack that demonstrates a systematic review programme to external auditors. Structured database records replace meeting minutes in shared folders, ensuring the management review is evidenced as a governance process rather than an administrative event.
A maintenance management system that records planned and reactive maintenance schedules, raises and tracks work orders, and captures completion evidence with technician identity and timestamp. Satisfies ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.3 infrastructure maintenance obligations by producing documented evidence that equipment maintenance is planned, executed, and recorded — not merely asserted.
A structured downtime logging system that captures unplanned production stoppages, links them to root cause categories, and tracks corrective actions through to closure. The aggregate data feeds ISO 9001 Clause 10.2 continual improvement evidence by demonstrating that the organisation systematically analyses failure patterns — not just individual incidents — and implements structural improvements over time.
CQC Well-Led Framework · NHS Improvement Standards · NICE Guidance · CQC Fundamental Standards
A structured evidence register that maps governance activities and outcomes directly to the CQC Well-Led key question and its sub-questions (KLOEs). Every piece of evidence — policy review, incident outcome, staff feedback, audit result — is stored against the specific Well-Led indicator it satisfies, enabling the provider to demonstrate a systematic governance programme rather than assembling an evidence portfolio from disparate sources in the weeks before a CQC inspection.
A governance committee evidence system that captures meeting agendas, attendance records, decisions, actions, and outcomes in a structured database rather than unlinked Word documents and email threads. Produces the documented evidence of functioning governance structures that CQC inspectors require under the Well-Led key question — a systematic, retrievable record of committee governance over time, not a folder of meeting minutes assembled for inspection day.
A structured speak-up and staff feedback register that captures concerns, compliments, and suggestions from staff — including via anonymous submission — and tracks leadership response and outcome. The system produces the evidence of a functioning speak-up culture that CQC inspects under Well-Led §3.1, demonstrating that concerns are received, taken seriously, and acted upon — not suppressed or left without recorded resolution.
A system for tracking the implementation status of applicable NICE guidance across the service — mapping each relevant Quality Standard and NICE guideline to current implementation status, responsible lead, completion evidence, and review date. Produces the implementation evidence that commissioners, CQC, and NHS Improvement expect to see demonstrating that the provider actively monitors and acts on NICE guidance rather than acknowledging its existence.
A complete clinical audit cycle management system that records audit design, data collection, results, recommendations, action plans, and re-audit outcomes in a structured database. Satisfies CQC and NHS Improvement requirements for evidence of a functioning clinical audit programme by storing the entire audit cycle — not just the initial audit report — demonstrating that findings result in implemented improvements and completed re-audit loops.
Every Mini Solution is delivered with the same three production layers — database, automation, and frontend — plus the documentation, deployment support, and ownership transfer that makes the system yours permanently.
Compliance teams have three choices when they face a regulatory obligation: engage a consultant, buy a SaaS subscription, or deploy a UNUS London Mini Solution. The comparison below maps all three across the dimensions that matter to compliance leaders in regulated industries.
| Dimension | Compliance Consultant | SaaS Platform | UNUS Mini Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical Cost | £2,000–£10,000 per system | £150–£800/month ongoing | £1,347–£1,697 one-time |
| Ongoing Cost | Billable hours for every change | Subscription renews indefinitely | £0 — no subscription, ever |
| Code / Data Ownership | ✗ Delivered as advice, not infrastructure | ✗ Vendor owns the platform and your data | ✓ 100% — schema, workflow, frontend |
| Audit Trail Immutability | ✗ Recommendations in a Word document | ◐ Depends on SaaS architecture | ✓ PostgreSQL trigger-enforced, structurally immutable |
| Evidence Retrieval Speed | ✗ Hours to days (manual assembly) | ◐ Minutes to hours (UI-filtered exports) | ✓ Under 30 seconds (direct database query) |
| Regulatory Framework Encoding | ✗ In the consultant's head — leaves with them | ◐ Generic fields; regulatory mapping manual | ✓ Hard-coded in schema constraints and ENUMs |
| Deployment Timeline | Weeks to months | Same day (configuration required) | 5–7 days to production |
| Vendor Dependency Post-Delivery | ✗ Ongoing retainer or re-engagement | ✗ Platform access ends on cancellation | ✓ Zero — system operates independently after handover |
| Extensibility | ✗ New project required for every change | ✗ Limited to platform's feature roadmap | ✓ Open schema — extend with SQL, n8n, or code |
Every Mini Solution is built on a stack of production-grade, open-source infrastructure. There is no proprietary UNUS London runtime. The system runs on tools you can operate, modify, and hand to any developer.
The Governance Academy is a Skool community that gives compliance professionals access to every system in the UNUS London library — including all 20 Mini Solutions, across all four industries — for a single monthly membership fee. Each system comes with its complete build guide, and new production systems are added monthly.
A 30-minute discovery call is enough to confirm which Mini Solution matches your immediate regulatory obligation, walk through the schema live, and agree a delivery timeline. No obligation. No sales pitch. A structured technical scoping session.